In this Zagury direction (2004, P. 45) he says in them that: In Brazil, the educational changes have been of? paper? , they occur in? law. But back in the classroom, the professor does not receive the training from that he needs to accomplish with security the new model. Much less it arrives them necessary supports of infra-structure-physics, material, or the equipment that could the least make possible some possibility of success. Still on the professor he affirms that one expects very of them, more than what is possible to carry through in the current conditions of the school. This contradicts the reality of what it demands the educational process and the constataes and affirmations as of Chalita (2004, p.161): The professor is the soul of any institution and no matter how hard if he invests in the equipage of the schools, in laboratories, libraries, anfiteatros, you square esportivas, swimming pools, fields of soccer – without denying the importance of all this instrument everything this is not configured more than what the aspects material if compared with the paper and the importance of the professor. Ahead of such constatao, as to explain that the majority of the professors that receives deaf pupils in the regular schools does not know to interact with the natural language of them, the POUNDS; vital instrument for the inclusion process, therefore, the relation of the citizen with the language goes to produce the difference. It is processed there of beforehand, the greater of the barriers for the integration of the deaf pupil who is the barrier of the communication. With this ' can be evidenced that; ' The deaf pupil still continues being ignored, for the school, in its necessity of communication, resulting in an education process/learning ineficiente' '. (NICOLUCCI; RASP; DAYS, 2004, p.45). It will have inclusion with this reality? The POUNDS are the natural language of the deaf people and they confer its culture and, over all, its identity.
To begin we must define what leadership: the activity of influence people to make you strive voluntarily in the achievement of the objectives of the group. Group it should be understood as a small group, the family and the community in which they live, an organization, etc. At the dawn of history, the leader was conceived as a being superior to the rest of the members of the group, with special attributes. An individual to prove his superiority to the community became the leader. It was considered that these powers or special attributes were born with them.Currently with the rise of psychology, he has tried to substantiate this perspective from the strong psychological link that we establish with our father, the first archetypal figure that we have. Psychological studies on leadership argue that we look for in our leaders the security it provided us the paternal symbol. And so, as we conceptualizabamos our father as a being perfect and infallible, reproduce this fixation towards our leaders, whereas more large, more intelligent and more capable than us. Although currently already is not intended that these skills are supernatural and the skills that make a leader are common to all, yes accepted that leaders possess these in greater degree. Leadership studies indicate that the leaders tend to be brighter, have better criteria, interact more, work well under stress, make decisions, tend to take the remote control or control, and feel self-confident. Transcendental leadership is based on values and performs them on a personal level and promotes them at a collective level. Those values don’t let the person encloses in itself or just practice them for her. They have a cultural force that can be perceived in the interpersonal relationship. The value is a well perfected to the person making it conscious and freely through habits of behavior the values put us in relation to the others who find if we live them or if they transcend them in the form of example to strengthen coexistence. There is thus a process rooted in behavior and cultural projection. Leadership with values necessarily transcends because that projection is inevitable and, moreover, very convenient to verify that the value is not only a personal but social issue. Others checked our values. Especially if we talk about ethical values. An honest person is not for himself, is relative to the others. It triggers a process that goes beyond one and another. The process of rooting of value, formation of habits of valuable shares, part of the person and once she succeeds, transcends organizations, call family, school business, or society. In addition, values are connected with each other in a sort of system of vessels communicating, influencing each other because you transcend each other. The dynamism of the values is continuous and produces an inner growth that drives each new Act of courage and consolidates the previous ones because the habit is a psychological process that gives stability to the actions.